Wondering about Remote Working and Diversity of Thinking

by Jenny Ambrozek

For those unable to attend hats off to Steve King, Jim Ware, and Josh Holbrook for a fabulous AppGap webinar Friday. It provided a complete scan of the remote working landscape including benefits and challenges to organizations.

Particularly thought provoking for me was the discussion about P&Gs “Connect & Develop” program as an example of “amplifying” individuals and organizations, and breaking down organizational barriers.  For a recent Inside Knowledge Magazine article on “Broadcasting Innovation” (co-authored with Victoria G. Axelrod) we contacted Larry Huston, Managing Director, 4iNNO, who as P&G’s Vice President of Innovation, was responsible for implementing “Connect & Develop”. Larry described the positive business impact of reaching beyond P&G’s internal research and development facilities for innovation as:

“Using this program, along with improvements in product cost, design and marketing, R&D productivity increased by nearly 60%. Innovation success rate more than doubled while the cost of innovation fell. From 2000-2006 R&D investment as percent of sales fell from 4.8% to 3.4% while creating 250 products generating billions in new top line sales.”

For the same article we also looked closely at InnoCentive, the innovation marketplace pharmaceuticals company Eli Lilly initiated in 2001 to reach beyond the walls of their internal laboratories and “crowd source” or “broadcast” their research needs.  Today InnoCentive connects commercial, academic, and nonprofit organizations “Seekers” that post “Challenges” spanning a wide spectrum of industries and disciplines to “Solvers“.  Solvers are incented with cash awards that have ranged from $5,000 to $1,000,000. 125,000 plus engineers, scientists, inventors, business people, and research organizations in more than 175 countries are reached.

Intriguing regarding InnoCentive is what Harvard Business School’s Lakhani and colleagues found from investigating 166 discrete scientific problems “broadcast” for resolution by 26 company laboratories between 2001 and 2005. They attributed this open approach to  “a 29.5% resolution rate for scientific problems unsolved by R & D laboratories of well known science-driven firms.” (1)

More interesting in light of Friday’s webinar was why accessing a larger pool of external talent works and other factors in problem resolution.  Success was associated with the ability to “attract specialized scientists with diverse scientific interests.”  In addition, “successful solvers created solutions to problems that were on the boundary or outside of their fields of expertise.” Openness worked to “trigger the transfer and transformation of knowledge from one scientific field to another. Efficiencies were gained as solver drew on information from previously developed solutions.” (1)

Knitting together the Lakhani et al InnoCentive findings with outcomes from recent research into how Google’s prediction markets operate has me wondering about the potential impact on geographically separating a company’s workers for diversity of thinking and innovation. At Google, Bo Cowgill (2) and researchers found:

Traders in the same location tend to make the same trades at the same time. The trades of cubemates within a small radius is the best predictor we found. By using a record of historical office changes, we could observe that the correlation begins shortly after people are seated nearby. It makes sense, because the physical proximity enables easy communication.”

So if:

i. Broadcasting problem research beyond the bounds of R&D labs through idea marketplaces like InnoCentive and P&G’s Connect & Develop program increases problem resolution, and

ii. Physical proximity of Google cubemates correlates with similar prediction market trading patterns

is it not possible that geographically dispersing workers, potentially, may result in more diverse thinking in an organization? 

My musing through Friday’s webinar about a possible link between remote working and diversity of thinking in organizations is pure speculation.  However, along with wondering what others took away from Friday’s seminar, I do wonder if anyone is aware of research into the topic of my speculation.

~ Jenny Ambrozek 

1. Lakhani, Karim R., Lars Bo Jeppesen, Peter A. Lohse, and Jill A. Panetta. “The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving.” Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 07-050, 2007.

2. Cowgill, B., et al 2008- “Using Prediction Markets to Track Information Flows: Evidence from Google

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/flow-of-information-at-googleplex.html

Share:
  • e-mail
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks


1 Comment »

  Steve wrote @ February 10th, 2008 at 6:20 pm

Jenny:

I think your point makes a lot of sense, although I’m not aware of any specific research on the topic. According to the book “The Wisdom of Crowds”, one of the 3 key attributes of a “wise crowd” is independence. This means people’s opinions are not determined by those around them.

That the co-located Google folks are voting the same way is not a surprise. They are likely exchanging information and forming a shared view instead of truly voting independently.

The other attributes of a wise crowd include divesity of opinion and decentralization – which the book describes as local knowledge that may or may not be available to the broader crowd.

So I think it does make sense that dispersing workers may result in more diverse and better organizational thinking. But the bigger impact may be that geographically dispersed workers simply have more diverse opinions and knowledge because they come from differenct backgrounds and experiences. It may be the people themselves, not where they are located.

Let me know if you come across any more information on this. Interesting topic.

Steve

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType





Custom Search
Online Database Reviews

Be sure to catch Bill Ives' ongoing review series in which he looks at online, sharable database apps. The focus of Bill's reviews: web-based business software that enables companies and individuals to better organize, track, and share information, as well as better manage projects, processes and workflows.

Among the Web-based tools he's reviewed: Zoho, QuickBase, and TrackVia.

Looking for apps that help you and your team get work done?

Check out the AppGap's Appopedia, an ever-expanding section with reviews of more than 150 of today's best tools to help you better manage projects and collaborate. Reviews are presented in a useful directory that breaks down tools by category and function, e.g., online crm, project management, human resources, security, etc. Check it out here.

The AppGap Webinar Series

The AppGap has hosted a series of discussions with leading thinkers and doers intended to illuminate how new apps and approaches are changing the way we work and help companies and individuals implement better collaboration, project management, and productivity practices and solutions. Access, via the links below, the recordings, each about an hour long, of the discussions.

- 5 Big Ideas for Getting All That Work Done
- Should Your Business be Friends with Facebook
- The Future of Work

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Recent Comments

  • Michal Wachstock: Disclaimer: I work for Clarizen. I know this conversation is a bit old, but I just bumped into it...
  • KateLukach: RT @BillIves: post on @theappgap @Coveo Provides Version 2.0 of Its Customer Information Access Solutions...
  • BillIves: post on @theappgap @Coveo Provides Version 2.0 of Its Customer Information Access Solutions (CIAS)...
  • Allen Bonde: Hi Bill – I agree these tools can be addictive! Kinda like candy for brand marketers :-) Thought...
  • eastwickcom: RT @BillIves: post on @theappgap NetBase Provides an Expanding Set of Social Media Monitoring Measures...
The AppGap is a blog and resource on the future of work and how new tools are addressing age-old challenges of organization, collaboration, and innovation. But it is also an idea: that there remains a gap between the toolset that exists and what's needed...

Can today's project management software be done better? What can online CRM help companies companies accomplish? Which development platform can help individuals and organizations build better online databases, Web based applications, and HR solutions? And what are the processes and best practices that help organizations large and small achieve success. Find out more.

About | Contributor Bios | Blog Policy | Contact us