The 2nd KM: Little KM

by Patti Anklam

In my first post on Three KMs, I outlined what I see as the “big KM” – the one that has budget, visibility, and is accountable to the organization (often with tangible ROI targets required).

I’d like to turn now to what I call “Little KM,” which I characterize as the quiet application of KM methods to business problems in a way that just makes sense. (You can also think about this as applying a “little KM perspective” to classic business activities.) In  little KM, the identified need for knowledge sharing maps to one or two of the KM methods, tools, or approaches. Any part of an organization may apply a KM practice to design and intervention in support of an immediate opportunity or problem.

The following list of practices, often applied without the code word “KM” (and sometimes described as “stealth” KM),  is based on having met or worked with people who specialize in these practices. I am sure that as you think about this concept, you will identify many more such practices.

Learning before, during, and after

Experiential knowledge is that which is not easily captured in classic “lessons learned” session. Practices for bringing experiential knowledge into a community include Peer Assists, Learning While Doing, and After Action Reviews (all beautifully described in Learning to Fly).

Outside (but near) the knowledge management community doing amazing work on Emergent Learning, Marilyn Darling has worked with corporate executives to apply after action reviews in a way that guides their future strategic action.

In a similar vein, Ken Bruss (who introduced me to the term “stealth KM” five years ago at a Boston KM Forum), has been integrating these learning practices into managing new product development processes.

Communities of practice.

Communities of practice are groups of people who engage in a process of collective learning. Through the work of Etienne Wenger and his colleagues, we have a rich set of practices that enable such communities to be designed and to sustain.
Although the term and related methods for COPs have been closely associated with KM, the notion of centers of expertise is widely applicable in settings outside of the KM umbrella. In either expertise- or functionally-based roles in organizations, staff and employees who are convened to share tips and techniques, new ideas, and so on, are in fact COP-like.


Knowledge continuity and retention.

The aging workforce is a problem being addressed by many organizations and institutions. Dave DeLong’s Lost Knowledge describes a number of programmatic approaches to the ensuring that vital organizational knowledge stays with an organization when a large number of its workforce retire.
One of the classic  staples of organizational development programs is mentoring, often done in the context of succession planning and resource development. Such programs not only help new, or junior employees gain access to the wisdom of senior people, but also to the connections of those people, passing on the social graph as well as the tacit knowledge.
Retention programs are focused on ensuring that the top performers stay in a company. Performance may include tangible results — meeting schedules, sales figures, and so on — but may also apply to the skills, knowledge, and experience the company needs to retain.

Knowledge mapping

Determining the core competencies of the corporation and mapping those competencies was introduced to the business management world by Gary Hamel and C. K. Prahalad in 1990. Competency modeling is a core HR practice that identifies high performers in key organizational roles and maps development programs to ensure that these skills are retained in the organization.

Organizational network analysis

Applying methods of social network analysis (SNA) to business problems is still an emerging practice for many large organizations; it’s often referred to organizational network analysis (ONA) — my preferred term.

The vanguard of organizational practitioners (corporate and government) participate in Rob Cross’s Network Roundtable at the University of Virginia, a user community that supports the use of and research in network analysis. Much of Rob’s early research has its roots in knowledge management (he was a consulting practitioner at the Institute for Knowledge Management), but is now articulated solely in business terms, aimed at solving problems of organizational and personal performance.

Applied as a knowledge management intervention, ONA can reveal the paths along which knowledge flows in an organization.

Collaboration.
Collaboration as a business priority has been increasing ground over the past 10 years, especially as the platforms (IBM, Microsoft, OpenText, and so on) matured. While some of these were used for their content management or project management capabilities, the leadership mandate was often phrased as “we need to collaborate more.”

As collaboration inside the organization was seen as important, organizations are now understanding that collaboration with customers and partners is vital.

Why Think about Little KM?

My thinking about little KM has changed as I’ve shifted from a corporate mindset to a small business and nonprofit mindset. Knowledge management is fairly well entrenched in large organizations, and each of the little KM practices figure into those Big KM programs.

I am also aware of the ongoing conversations about whether KM is dead, whether we should stop using the term KM, and so on. So it makes sense to talk about specific practices under the rubric of KM and work inside organizations applying these practices as need arises.

What’s important to remember, however, is that we could not have little KM if we didn’t have Big KM as a source of thought leaders and practitioners who have worked over the past 10 or more years to hone these practices in collaboration with others (As I like to say, “Knowledge management people share, relentlessly.) .

Next up: Personal KM

Share:
  • e-mail
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Facebook
  • Google


7 Tweets

11 Comments »

  Marilyn Darling wrote @ September 25th, 2009 at 7:28 am

Thanks, Patti, for the lovely endorsement about our work in Emergent Learning.

I am interested in your distinctions about ‘big,’ ‘little,’ and ‘personal’ KM. A practice that I have often touted as the cheapest and, perhaps, most efficient KM practice is something we learned from the U.S. Army: Continuity Folders. In our context of doing knowledge management in civilian organizations, if you think of this idea in its most literal sense, it means keeping a literal folder with notes from After Action Reviews related to a particular work process and pulling them out each time you are about to plan the next piece of action. Voila! Knowledge Management.

The reason this notion sticks with me is that we tend to focus on sharing knowledge with others. But if the definition of a lesson learned is not just that behavior changes, but that thinking also is refined and better results are produced, the first “customer” for an insight should be your own team, where the lesson is most likely to be most easily applied. After two or three times around the learning cycle, an insight becomes more robust and shareable.

So I think the ‘little’ idea of a Continuity Folder holds a great deal of power to create knowledge.

  Tom Graves » A week in Tweets: 4-10 Oct 09 wrote @ October 27th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

[...] The 3rd KM: personal knowledge management #km http://tinyurl.com/ybqgz7y <also Little KM: http://www.theappgap.com/the-2nd-km-little-km.html and Big KM http://www.theappgap.com/three-kms.html – “Big KM is about top-down, [...]

  Tom Graves » Big EA, Little EA and Personal EA wrote @ January 6th, 2010 at 3:43 pm

[...] Little KM is about safe-fail experiments embedded in the organizational structure [...]

[...] Little KM is about safe-fail experiments embedded in the organizational structure [...]

  theappgap wrote @ September 24th, 2009 at 10:11 am

New Post “The 2nd KM: Little KM” http://bit.ly/27yaq

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  hebsgaard wrote @ September 24th, 2009 at 11:05 am

The 2nd KM: Little #KM http://tinyurl.com/ycetpa5

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  tetradian wrote @ September 24th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

RT @hebsgaard The 2nd KM: Little #KM http://tinyurl.com/ycetpa5

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  EdNadrotowicz wrote @ September 24th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

RT @tetradian, @hebsgaard The 2nd KM: Little #KM http://tinyurl.com/ycetpa5

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  elmi wrote @ September 24th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

This one is so true for @mhiscock “As I like to say, “Knowledge management people share, relentlessly” @panklam http://tinyurl.com/ydeljyr

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  MitchDenny wrote @ September 24th, 2009 at 10:16 pm

@digory – thought you might be interested in this http://tinyurl.com/ydeljyr

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  jeffrey_brandt wrote @ September 28th, 2009 at 6:16 am

Reading about 2 of the “Three KMs” by Patti Anklam http://bit.ly/3RiRfp http://bit.ly/BpQpg

This comment was originally posted on Twitter

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType





Custom Search
Online Database Reviews

Be sure to catch Bill Ives' ongoing review series in which he looks at online, sharable database apps. The focus of Bill's reviews: web-based business software that enables companies and individuals to better organize, track, and share information, as well as better manage projects, processes and workflows.

Among the Web-based tools he's reviewed: Zoho, QuickBase, and TrackVia.

Looking for apps that help you and your team get work done?

Check out the AppGap's Appopedia, an ever-expanding section with reviews of more than 150 of today's best tools to help you better manage projects and collaborate. Reviews are presented in a useful directory that breaks down tools by category and function, e.g., online crm, project management, human resources, security, etc. Check it out here.

The AppGap Webinar Series

The AppGap has hosted a series of discussions with leading thinkers and doers intended to illuminate how new apps and approaches are changing the way we work and help companies and individuals implement better collaboration, project management, and productivity practices and solutions. Access, via the links below, the recordings, each about an hour long, of the discussions.

- 5 Big Ideas for Getting All That Work Done
- Should Your Business be Friends with Facebook
- The Future of Work

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Recent Comments

  • StefanieM: RT @BillIves: post on Brightidea Releases its Idea Management Apps for iPhone and Android Platforms...
  • JanelleTNoble: @Brightideahq on the leading edge of collaboration trends- going mobile, a must! http://bit.ly/c1DclV...
  • BrightideaHQ: RT @theappgap: New Post “Brightidea Releases its Idea Management Apps for iPhone and Android...
  • insitevc: RT @BillIves: post on Brightidea Releases its Idea Management Apps for iPhone and Android Platforms...
  • ArikJohnson: RT @BillIves Brightidea Releases Idea Management Apps for #iPhone & #Android http://bit.ly/d1VsOR...
The AppGap is a blog and resource on the future of work and how new tools are addressing age-old challenges of organization, collaboration, and innovation. But it is also an idea: that there remains a gap between the toolset that exists and what's needed...

Can today's project management software be done better? What can online CRM help companies companies accomplish? Which development platform can help individuals and organizations build better online databases, Web based applications, and HR solutions? And what are the processes and best practices that help organizations large and small achieve success. Find out more.

About | Contributor Bios | Blog Policy | Contact us