Social architecture

by Patti Anklam

I’ve been working lately on two projects with companies building social networking platforms with a purpose. While some aspects are clearly around technology, features, and the like, there are also the subtle aspects that go into understanding how these sites will be used. In a meeting with one of the clients, we talked about this difficult area of how to ensure that the use of the site aligns with its purpose: will people interact on the topics that we want them to, will the site discourage irrelevant content or social tourists from joining?

The word “social architecture” came into my head (or all of our heads simultaneously, it’s always hard to tell, isn’t it, when an idea emerges from the collective consciousness in a conversation?).

Like a good web 2.0 doo-bie, I tweeted that I was interested in using the term but needed to understand it more. My friend and colleague, Andrew Gent, tweeted back a definition, but then went on to do much more: he researched it, thought about, and has written a wonderful blog post, Social Architecture, that offers the definition that he tweeted back to me:

Social architecture is the conscious design of an environment that encourages certain social behavior leading towards some goal or set of goals.

Andrew’s blog details the current use of the term with respect to social media as well as its history in the field of architecture. When I began my own superficial search, the thread I followed was biased toward the design of the interaction of various social media (Sam Huleatt: “To me, social architecture is best thought of as a cross between three elements: interface design, social media functionality and user engagement strategy.”) which didn’t reflect what I needed. Andrew has, I think, hit on the more sociological and social engineering (without the negative connotations of that term) disciplines needed to shape a user’s experience.

While Andrew’s context is the corporate intranet, where it is possibly simpler to design intent and purpose into the environment, my work is currently leading me to social networks in the world, a case where an individual company wants to draw people into a network to expand its field of vision and expertise.  No answers yet, but Andrew’s exposition is a terrific start and I thank him very much.

Share:
  • e-mail
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Facebook
  • Google


8 Comments »

  Jenny Ambrozek wrote @ April 10th, 2009 at 7:05 am

Patti, Intriguing post. Thanks. In your “social architecture” research I wonder if you looked at Ross Mayfield’s “Power Law of Participation”
http://ross.typepad.com/blog/2006/04/power_law_of_pa.html

that I find helps people understand beyond the “social” the array of roles and levels of engagement needed to make online spaces and networks accomplish the creator’s ambitions:
http://snurl.com/fmfwm [www_oreillynet_com]

I believe Ross’s Power Law was inspired by Tim O’Reilly’s 2004 “the architecture of participation” “to describe the nature of systems that are designed for user contribution”
http://snurl.com/fmfwm [www_oreillynet_com]

And I believe we both know Estee Solomon Gray who, with John Seely Brown contributed “People are the Company” to the inaugural “Fast Company” Magazine in 1995. In that they wrote: “Organizations are webs of participation. Change the patterns of participation, and you change the organization” http://www.fastcompany.com/node/26238/print

  scorpfromhell wrote @ April 10th, 2009 at 7:22 am

I like the definition but I like the issue that was discussed even more – ensure that the use of the site aligns with its purpose. I am after all interested in social apps from a CRM perspective. :)

Now I need to weave this issue somehow into my proposed Social CRM IT landscape. :)

  Martin Lindeskog wrote @ April 10th, 2009 at 7:39 am

Maybe we will see an IT version of the great architect, Frank Lloyd Wright, in the social platform field?

  Shiv Singh wrote @ April 10th, 2009 at 11:09 pm

Nice post. Reminds me of the research into social products in the human computer interaction space. But I prefer the framework as social architecture because it emphasizes the flow and how people interacting with each other is very much at the center. It is an architecture more than a product.

  Shiv Singh wrote @ April 10th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

As a follow up, here’s a great paper by Jodi Forlizzi of CMU on the subject – http://goodgestreet.com/CHI09/submissions/Forlizzi.pdf

  Jenny Ambrozek wrote @ April 11th, 2009 at 9:37 am

Timely topic given Business Week story “Putting a Price on Social Connections” reporting IBM MIT research: http://snurl.com/fosj1

  Jon Husband wrote @ April 16th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

Thoughtful post.

Of course I’d think so …. the signature line on my email and the tag line on my business cards reads “Social architecture and strategy for wired organizations”.

;-)

But seriously … thanks for the thoughtful post.

  Harold Jarche » Mapping metrics wrote @ May 11th, 2009 at 8:15 am

[...] developing a non-profit campaign or a business network, it’s important to develop a social architecture, not just a technical one: Social architecture is the conscious design of an environment that [...]

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType





Custom Search
Online Database Reviews

Be sure to catch Bill Ives' ongoing review series in which he looks at online, sharable database apps. The focus of Bill's reviews: web-based business software that enables companies and individuals to better organize, track, and share information, as well as better manage projects, processes and workflows.

Among the Web-based tools he's reviewed: Zoho, QuickBase, and TrackVia.

Looking for apps that help you and your team get work done?

Check out the AppGap's Appopedia, an ever-expanding section with reviews of more than 150 of today's best tools to help you better manage projects and collaborate. Reviews are presented in a useful directory that breaks down tools by category and function, e.g., online crm, project management, human resources, security, etc. Check it out here.

The AppGap Webinar Series

The AppGap has hosted a series of discussions with leading thinkers and doers intended to illuminate how new apps and approaches are changing the way we work and help companies and individuals implement better collaboration, project management, and productivity practices and solutions. Access, via the links below, the recordings, each about an hour long, of the discussions.

- 5 Big Ideas for Getting All That Work Done
- Should Your Business be Friends with Facebook
- The Future of Work

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Recent Comments

  • mahoganyltd: Webtrends Promotes Openness in its Product and Company Strategy http://goo.gl/fb/5qQn This comment was...
  • ericssonc: @Webtrends Promotes Openness in its Product and Company Strategy http://bit.ly/cnGEA1 This comment was...
  • sympmarc: RT @BillIves: my post – Webtrends Promotes Openness in its Product and Company Strategy...
  • BillIves: my post – Webtrends Promotes Openness in its Product and Company Strategy http://bit.ly/cnGEA1...
  • theappgap: New Post “Webtrends Promotes Openness in its Product and Company Strategy”...
The AppGap is a blog and resource on the future of work and how new tools are addressing age-old challenges of organization, collaboration, and innovation. But it is also an idea: that there remains a gap between the toolset that exists and what's needed...

Can today's project management software be done better? What can online CRM help companies companies accomplish? Which development platform can help individuals and organizations build better online databases, Web based applications, and HR solutions? And what are the processes and best practices that help organizations large and small achieve success. Find out more.

About | Contributor Bios | Blog Policy | Contact us