http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html Apps, Strategies, and Best Practices for Web-based work Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:56:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html/comment-page-1#comment-9244 ROI for Social Computing and What’s in it for me ?! | Enterprise Social Search Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:27:49 +0000 http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html#comment-9244 [...] September An article originally posted on www.theappgap.com [...] [...] September An article originally posted on http://www.theappgap.com [...]

]]> http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html/comment-page-1#comment-8399 The AppGap » » Collaboration — What’s in it for me?!: News, views, and reviews of Work 2.0 tools, apps and practices Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:39:27 +0000 http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html#comment-8399 [...] Atul Rai: Matthew, i would think rather than simply giving people the tools to collaborate, we need to address their... [...] [...] Atul Rai: Matthew, i would think rather than simply giving people the tools to collaborate, we need to address their… [...]

]]> http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html/comment-page-1#comment-8392 Library clips :: ROI for the knowledge worker is ROI for all, and how KM took an ironic approach :: August :: 2008 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:50:44 +0000 http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html#comment-8392 [...] this post all started from a great post on the AppGap group blog by Matthew Hodgson. For some of my similar posts see KM round 2.0 and KM 2.0 culture, read [...] [...] this post all started from a great post on the AppGap group blog by Matthew Hodgson. For some of my similar posts see KM round 2.0 and KM 2.0 culture, read [...]

]]> http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html/comment-page-1#comment-8202 Atul Rai Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:12:42 +0000 http://www.theappgap.com/roi-for-social-computing.html#comment-8202 Matthew, i would think rather than simply giving people the tools to collaborate, we need to address their WIIFM ... what do people get by collaborating? This seems rhetorical, but usually isnt. Unless we do this, adoption tends to be very low, and then, its a chicken-and-egg situation ... no value till people start collaborating, and people dont start collaborating till they see value. Matthew, i would think rather than simply giving people the tools to collaborate, we need to address their WIIFM … what do people get by collaborating? This seems rhetorical, but usually isnt. Unless we do this, adoption tends to be very low, and then, its a chicken-and-egg situation … no value till people start collaborating, and people dont start collaborating till they see value.

]]>