BoardVantage – Taking Enterprise 2.0 into the Boardroom

by Bill Ives

Here is a company with a great idea and one that is helping all of us by demonstrating the power of enterprise 2.0 at the top of the organization. One of the first examples that got me excited about the possibilities of enterprise 2.0 was the use of a blog platform in 2004 to help a group of senior executives, doctors in this case, develop a strategic plan. The control transparency facilitated ongoing communication between meetings, provided an accessible, searchable archive of everything they did, making the process both more efficient and effective. I am excited to see a company that has taken this concept many steps further.

Recently, I spoke with Joe Ruck, CEO at BoardVantage. Their Board Portal centralizes documents, processes and communication in a secure but user-friendly Web portal, designed for boards of directors. Each component of this previous sentence is key as Joe explained. First, there has been a gradual transition from paper-based to electronic documentation for board meetings. It used to be that the general counsel’s office would put together a 500 – 2,000 page paper binder for board meetings. It also used to be that board meetings were more ceremonial than they are now. However, the fall out from Enron and other related events, as well as the quickening of the pace of boardwork largely driven by global competition combined to place a greater emphasis on the active and ongoing involvement of boards .

The general movement toward more electronic documentation accelerated this transition and in turn ratcheted up the need for security. If managed right, electronic communication can be more secure that binders that can be left in hotels or cabs and are difficult to lug around; or faxes that go to the wrong place or, at best, are seen by too many support staff; or email where control goes out the window when you hit the send button.

However, many board members are not that technical so ease of use is a premium to gain initial acceptance and ensure actual use by the board members, themselves. Also, the people who put the materials together are often not technical, themselves, so the administration part also needs to be easy. Lastly, the system needs to support more than documents as the need for greater involvement between meetings brings forward the need for process and communication, not just document storage and sharing.

To meet these objectives BoardVantage incorporates a toolkit for creating and distributing board materials for use in meetings and managing all processes that take place in between meetings. BoardVantage is offered as a hosted service that meets or exceeds the standards of security-conscious IT departments, including those of major financial institutions.

The meeting-based features for board members includes: secure on-line and offline access, a searchable repository, the ability to annotate documents, email and voice alerts when new materials are available, and role-based content filtering. The features for corporate secretaries and support staff include: drag and drop uploading of documents, automated pdf conversion, automation of much of the board book creation process, auto-updates to board books, notification, and role-based distribution.

The features to support communication between meetings for board members include: easy to use consents, conferencing, secure messaging, a central address book, board calendar, and point and click evaluations and surveys. The corresponding set of similar features is available for corporate secretaries and support staff.

Joe said the concept and BoardVantage has really taken off recently as the benefits of electronic communication and collaboration have risen to the top levels of organizations. They are introducing the concept and benefits of controlled transparency, a basic premise of enterprise 2.0, at the top of an increasing number of large corporations. BoardVantage generally actively sells to the people who support boards. Because of the interlocking nature of many board populations, there is also increasing viral marketing of what they can offer. They strike a balance in their offering and promotion between what they refer to as “traditionals” who need to be convinced of the new ways of doing things and the “progressives” who understand the new space and want advanced features. Here is an on-line demonstration of what BoardVantage offers that goes into a bit more detail.

I think BoardVantage is doing all of us a service by demonstrating the power of controlled transparency to the decision makers in large organizations. Now that BoardVantage has a secure place at the top, they are planning to expand their product to other parts of the enterprise. I think they are well positioned to take this next step.

Share:
  • e-mail
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Facebook
  • Google


6 Comments

  Jenny Ambrozek wrote @ May 16th, 2008 at 11:23 am

Bill, do appreciate your reviews to sift the continuous stream it appears of new tools. I couldn’t help but wonder reading your post at what point “Enteprise 2.0″ becomes redundant. On the one hand I look at new aspirants entering the market. On the other existing enterprise platform providers like IBM adding functionality to their platforms as they did with ATLAS.

I remember attending an online learning industry conference in the early 21st century where an industry analyst observed in the past year the number of software providers he covered had about halved because of small players dropping off and larger gobbling up the cream of the crop.

Should I expect a similar evolution of what we currently know as “Enterprise 2.0″ tools?

~ Jenny

  Bill Ives wrote @ May 16th, 2008 at 4:01 pm

Jenny you raise two good points. First the label enterprise 2.0. I try to only apply when I feel it is warranted but then I also only tend to interview people and companies where the label applies since that is the focus of this blog. I get asked by many companies, usually through their PR or marketing arm, to be interviewed for the App Gap. I try to only accept those that have an enterprise 2.0 story to tell. If I have a doubt I tell them this criteria. I define enterprise 2.0 as the use of controlled transparency inside the firewall for business objectives. Although I will also cover people who try to set up communities outside the firewall for their clients or market. This controlled transparency often involves open APIs and the social side of software. In this case I used the term enterprise 2.0 in the title because it was the first firm I encountered that used controlled transparency for this niche audience. I do not always use the term in titles. I do try to show the variety of applications that are taking this enterprise 2.0 approach. I am not an advocate of the term but it seems to be the best alternative for now. I never liked knowledge management either but that term stuck also.

The second question about the future of the smaller firms is an interesting one. I image it will go the way of many software markets. The also rans drop out. The good ones either find a niche and partnerships to stay independent or they sell to the big players. The large vendors are certainly adding some enterprise 2.0 features but these are usually bundled with their boarder offerings and are more expensive. I think there is definitely a role for smaller pure play vendors at this stage in the market. That is often where the real innovation goes. What happens when the market matures will be interesting.

  Shiv Singh wrote @ May 17th, 2008 at 10:40 am

That’s a very interesting question about the smaller companies. I’ve argued for a year or so that many of the smaller companies should come together and provide Enterprise 2.0 Suites – application suites that pull together different mini applications. Unless they are evolving to an ad supported model (which hasn’t succeeded in the enterprise as yet), it will always be difficult for them to support a sales force and seriously target the enterprise. At the most, they’ll be left to focus on the SMB market.

Partnerships is indeed one way out of this. The big players whether it be portal or otherwise are incorporating more and more Enterprise 2.0 functionality.

  Bill Ives wrote @ May 17th, 2008 at 10:56 am

Shiv – interesting point but it if you mean partnerships between smaller players it might be hard to make happen practically since many smaller vendors have overlapping functions and most are adding new functions to make themselves a more complete suite. If you mean partnerships and/or integration with larger players, that is certainly happening. I would imagine that the exit strategy for many smaller players is to be acquired. That happens with even the bigger guys like WebEX being bought by Cisco. I am not saying that was their exit strategy, it is just what happen. In the case of the the product in this post, BoardVantage, they offer a fully functional tool (for the target task) that is aimed at and optimized for a very niche market. It is a horizontal function player at the top which I found interesting since many of the enterprise 2.0 tools are aimed at a bottom up approach for gaining entry to the enterprise. Zoho is one company that keeps adding new tools to develop a suite in the way I think you are describing but they do it all themselves. I also certainly agree that ad supported will not work in the enterprise. Bill

  Raibiatut wrote @ October 5th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

Hi, everybody!

I think, that this is a great forum. Very intresting and useful.
But I can’t find the search function, cause I want faster find the topics that could be intresting for me to express my opinion…
Please help me with search function on this forum!

  Bill Ives wrote @ October 7th, 2008 at 9:20 am

I am glad you enjoy the forum. Search is located about half way down on the right side bar. We are thinking about moving it up to make it more visible. Bill

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Additional comments powered by BackType





Custom Search
Online Database Reviews

Be sure to catch Bill Ives' ongoing review series in which he looks at online, sharable database apps. The focus of Bill's reviews: web-based business software that enables companies and individuals to better organize, track, and share information, as well as better manage projects, processes and workflows.

Among the Web-based tools he's reviewed: Zoho, QuickBase, and TrackVia.

Looking for apps that help you and your team get work done?

Check out the AppGap's Appopedia, an ever-expanding section with reviews of more than 150 of today's best tools to help you better manage projects and collaborate. Reviews are presented in a useful directory that breaks down tools by category and function, e.g., online crm, project management, human resources, security, etc. Check it out here.

The AppGap Webinar Series

The AppGap has hosted a series of discussions with leading thinkers and doers intended to illuminate how new apps and approaches are changing the way we work and help companies and individuals implement better collaboration, project management, and productivity practices and solutions. Access, via the links below, the recordings, each about an hour long, of the discussions.

- 5 Big Ideas for Getting All That Work Done
- Should Your Business be Friends with Facebook
- The Future of Work

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Recent Comments

  • aponcier: The Rise of Micro-blogging Capability in Enterprise Collaboration Platforms http://is.gd/aQ2LJ This comment...
  • workcolab: RT @theappgap: New Post “The Rise of Micro-blogging Capability in Enterprise Collaboration...
  • hopenic: RT @bhavaom: Rise of Micro-blogging Capability in Enterprise Collaboration Platforms, by @BillIves on...
  • ColetteCote: The Rise of Micro-blogging Capability in Enterprise #Collaboration Platforms http://tinyurl.com/ybgl3sr...
  • NahumG: RT @hebsgaard: The Rise of Micro-blogging Capability in Enterprise Collaboration Platforms...
The AppGap is a blog and resource on the future of work and how new tools are addressing age-old challenges of organization, collaboration, and innovation. But it is also an idea: that there remains a gap between the toolset that exists and what's needed...

Can today's project management software be done better? What can online CRM help companies companies accomplish? Which development platform can help individuals and organizations build better online databases, Web based applications, and HR solutions? And what are the processes and best practices that help organizations large and small achieve success. Find out more.

About | Contributor Bios | Blog Policy | Contact us