Another Endorsement for Enterprise 2.0 Vendors

by Bill Ives

I have been writing about a number of enterprise 2.0 vendors on this blog, as have my co-contributors. I am sure that many of them were pleased by, Web 2.0 Pure Plays Might be the Right Answer for Your Organization, a new Forrester report by Rob Koplowitz. These vendors mentioned must be especially pleased but reports like this also help to validate the entire market. In summary, “pure plays differentiate on their ability to serve the multifaceted needs of an enterprise, such as using Web 2.0 technology in public-facing situations, across secure connections with customers and partners, and internally. These vendors implement and customize offerings for each of these use cases. Large traditional vendors - such as IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, and SAP - tend to focus on internally facing solutions that leverage their existing offerings and technology footprint.”

In other words, you might get more value for your money quicker with one of the smaller vendors that are not burdened by existing technology structure and are designed for rapid implementation, often as SaaS. I am especially impressed with what I refer to as the second generation of enterprise 2.0 software suppliers like a number of those named in the Forrester report (e.g., Awareness, Jive, Traction), as well as our sponsor, QuickBase. Forrester refers to these as workspace vendors. These firms go beyond first generation tools such as blogs and wikis to create hybrid solutions that promote collaboration within work processes. At the same time, these workspace tools bring along the transparency and ease of user generated content that marked blogs and wikis.

The Forrester report provides a nice summary of the issues and what to look for in the pure play vendors.

Share:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Wists


1 Comment »

  Vassil Mladjov wrote @ February 15th, 2008 at 8:42 pm

Bill,
Have you checked if Forrester discloses their web 2.0 clients as well? You may want to check this.
There are some interesting co-relations. ;) I am not sure if the people who have wrote the report even use these tools themselves nowadays. Before, when another Forrester analyst was in charge of this , they only did a short web demo and that was it. I can not recommend a tool to a friend not to mention a client or a whole industry before I know how to use it and if it works and do ton of testing on top. Maybe Forrester knows better. And as far as the big vendors, their tools are so behind the curve that I don’t want to even start. Most of them are in beta and it may take them a few more years before they bring to the market.

Cheers,
Vassil

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

The AppGap is a blog and resource on the future of work and how new tools are addressing age-old challenges of organization, collaboration, and innovation. But it is also an idea: that there remains a gap between the toolset that exists and what's needed... More about us.

About | Contributor Bios | Blog Policy | Contact us
Webinar on the "Future of Work"

We recently convened several leading thinkers for an excellent roundtable-style public conference call on the "future of work". The discussion was moderated by Bill Lucchini and included Steve King, Research Fellow at the Institute for the Future, Jim Ware, co-founder of the Future of Work and a contributor to this blog, and Yankee Analyst Josh Holbrook. We've now made the recording available - visit this post to listen to it and feel free to follow up with commentary and questions.